 |
 |
How is North Carolina Addressing the Environment?
In recent years, environmental considerations associated with transportation projects have been
incorporated earlier in the overall planning process. Department staff is conducting more
environmental prescreening analyses in the systems-level planning process and working to improve
the Purpose and Need statements that represent the first phase of project development.
Section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
requires the completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for projects that have a
significant impact on the environment. The EIS includes impacts on wetlands, wildlife, water
quality, historic properties, and public lands. In many cases, new location highway projects
pose the greatest challenge for meeting NEPA requirements due to the obvious impacts created
in undeveloped areas. Environmental complications and project complexities have overwhelmed
resources and put state and federal agencies at odds with one another over how to best
balance project delivery versus protecting endangered species or sensitive ecological areas.
NCDOT has established itself as a national leader in this field by working to build
consensus among parties and identifying mutual goals that lead to a streamlined process.
These efforts have resulted in the creation of an
Office of Environmental Quality and
application of a highly recognized
Environmental Stewardship Policy.
NCDOT and its partners are also working towards achieving nine
streamlining goals which
are intended to reduce time in the project planning and delivery process while maintaining a
commitment to environmental excellence. The Strategic Highway Corridors initiative fits the
tone of these efforts by promoting resources to maximize the use of existing highway
infrastructure and improve operational movement within existing highway corridors. A study
of similar, long-distance corridor planning at
Oregon Department of Transportation revealed
a series of direct environmental benefits, which could be replicated in North Carolina.
The list includes:
- Resolution of Major Planning Issues Prior to the Initiation of Project Development.
Consensus among local, regional, state, and federal agencies regarding a long-term planning
vision and purpose is essential to successful project development. Corridor planning
provides a framework within which a vision for individual corridors in communities can be
reviewed, prioritized, and advanced under a consensus.
- Preservation of Transportation Rights-of-Way.
Costs for transportation rights-of-way increase substantially as land suitable for
transportation is developed for other purposes. Uncertainty about right-of-way needs may
also impact property owners, businesses, and in some cases entire communities. The scope
and 25-year horizon of a corridor plan can identify long-range right-of-way needs which
serve to direct future development, reducing development costs and specifically
environmental, social, and economic impacts.
- Protection of Transportation Investments.
To prevent premature obsolescence of highways and other facilities, corridor planning
examines alternate means to accommodate transportation needs with and without
capital-investment improvements. Alternatives such as access management, utilization of
parallel local streets, reconfigured land use patterns, and demand management programs
(i.e., telecommuting, rideshare, public transportation, flex-time, etc.) are considered
in lieu of or in addition to major capital improvements. All of these result in limited
impacts to the surrounding environment, and can provide other community enhancement and
quality of life benefits.
- Partnership With Diverse Public and Private Agencies and Organizations.
Corridor planning provides a forum for resolution of policy issues and negotiation of
strategic partnerships between organizations striving to fulfill complimentary missions
with limited resources. New innovative public-private partnerships, cost sharing
agreements, and confidence-building measures can be enacted to bring multiple parties
around a common goal.
Along with the benefits outlined above, NCDOT should also consider other innovative
solutions for leveraging the use of corridor planning. One example might include moving
towards an incentive-based "flexible mitigation" policy along Strategic Highway Corridors.
All agencies involved would agree up front to identify and improve the "green"
infrastructure (greenways or nature trails) along with and in response to the unavoidable
impacts created by improving the "grey" infrastructure, i.e., the actual physical highway
and cross streets. This type of planning would be particularly effective along designated
scenic highway corridors.
Efforts should also be made to maintain the natural beauty of an area when making
transportation improvements. The Baltimore-Washington Parkway in Maryland provides a
good example of preserving the scenic character of an area while providing high-speed
mobility for commuters and tourists (see graphics below). Working together with local
stakeholders, NCDOT should seek context sensitive solutions that not only enhance the
transportation function of the roadway, but also the surrounding area.
Baltimore-Washington Parkway
|
 |
 |