NCDOT: Kinston Bypass - Frequently Asked Questions

Download frequently asked questions in Spanish.

Expand All

Collapse All

What is the Kinston Bypass project and why is it needed?
The purpose of the Kinston Bypass project is to improve regional mobility and connectivity along U.S. 70 between La Grange (Lenoir County) and Dover (Craven County). The project will be a freeway (future Interstate 42) with four lanes, a divided median and interchanges with bridges, ramps and loops. The highway will be approximately 21 miles long with a posted speed limit of 70 mph.
How is the Kinston Bypass project funded?
The Kinston Bypass project was previously included in N.C. Department of Transportation’s Statewide Transportation Improvement Program, or STIP. The project has been funded with state funds since it was first included in the N.C. Highway Trust Fund Act (1989). State funds were identified for this project, as they are NCDOT’s largest funding source (approximately 75 percent of total funding).
This project will be reprioritized for funding in the next State Transportation Improvement Program. A schedule for right of way, utilities and/or construction has not been finalized at this time. Currently, the Kinston Bypass is only funded through the completion of the Record of Decision.
Who are the primary agencies involved in the project and what are their roles?
The Kinston Bypass project is following the highest-level environmental review process defined by the National Environmental Impact Statement (NEPA) regulations. This process includes extensive involvement by both the public and various resources agencies that have responsibilities to provide data and information related to environmental resources and impacts. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) is the lead federal agency with responsibility to ensure the NEPA process is thorough and complete. The NEPA process also addresses other environmental laws including Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The key resource agencies comprise a group called the Merger Team and includes NCDOT and the following agencies:
- U.S. Army Corps of Engineer
- N.C. Department of Environmental Quality’s Division of Water Resources and Division of Coastal Management
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Services
- N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
- N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources
- Eastern Carolina Rural Planning Organization
- Down East Rural Planning Organization
The Merger Team provides a forum to discuss and reach consensus on major project milestones through a shared decision-making process. To date, the Merger Team has reached concurrence on the project purpose and need, detailed study alternatives, the preferred alternative and minimization and mitigation of environmental impacts.
How were alternatives developed and evaluated?
NCDOT began with the evaluation of 300 best-fit segments that were used to identify 95 preliminary alternatives, which were ultimately narrowed to 12 alternatives that met the project’s purpose and need. These 12 alternatives, which included Alternative 1SB (applicant's preferred alternative), were presented to the public in 2019 at the corridor public hearing and documented in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement and associated technical studies. Information for the 12 alternatives included interchange locations, potential service road locations, potential bridge locations, as well as GIS-calculated potential impacts to natural, cultural, community, and socio-economic resources for 1,000-foot corridors.
How was the applicant's preferred alternative selected?
In February 2020, after considering all potential natural, cultural, community, and socio-economic impacts and public input from the 2019 corridor public hearing, NCDOT selected Alternative 1SB as the applicant's preferred alternative. It had the most public support, shortest project length, least amount of projected wetland impacts and highest projected net economic benefit, while also preserving the rural character of southern Lenoir County.
What has the NCDOT been working on since the preferred alternative was selected?
Since the selection of the applicant's preferred alternative, the corridor has undergone extensive evaluation. Wetlands and streams have been fully delineated and surveyed for threatened and endangered species, which are summarized in the Natural Resources Technical Report. Archaeological resources have also been fully surveyed and are detailed in the Archaeological Survey Report.
Outreach efforts have been made to businesses and vulnerable communities through both group and individual meetings. These efforts are documented in the Public Involvement Plan, Community Impact Assessment, and Economic Impact Assessment. The GeoEnvironmental Report and Traffic Noise Report have also been updated. The preliminary roadway designs have been refined. The preliminary roadway designs used the information in the technical reports to minimize impacts to natural, cultural, community, and socio-economic resources. Minimization strategies included interchange design modifications and shifting service roads closer to U.S. 70.
The USACE and NCDOT reviewed adverse effects to architectural and archaeological resources with the NCHPO and NCOSA based on the preliminary, proposed roadway designs. Adverse effects were identified for an archaeological site (unmapped, not on the Wyse Fork Battlefield); the Wyse Fork Battlefield; and the Cobb-King Humphrey House. Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the USACE invited national, state, and local historical agencies and organizations and key property owners to participate in a meeting with consulting parties to look at ways to minimize the project's adverse effects on historic resources. For more information, see the next FAQ on cultural resources.
All of this information will be formally presented to the public in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and at the Design Public Hearing. These minimization efforts will also be presented to and agreed upon by the Merger Team.
How has NCDOT considered cultural resources associated with the Kinston Bypass?
NCDOT is following federal guidelines that require agencies to consider their effects on historic properties. The entire corridor was surveyed for architectural and archaeological resources. This process included intensive research via literature reviews, input from local sources, site visits and archaeological surveys. The archaeological surveys included ground-penetrating radar of key areas identified by the N.C. State Historic Preservation Office (NCHPO) and the N.C. Office of State Archaeology (NCOSA). The survey findings were summarized in a 2021 archaeological survey report, the 2022 archaeological survey addendum, and 2024 archaeological survey addendum that was reviewed by the NCOSA and the NCHPO.

This map shows the historic architectural resources that are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and are found within the preferred alternative study corridor.

The USACE and NCDOT discussed adverse effects to architectural and archaeological resources with the NCHPO and NCOSA based on the preliminary, proposed roadway designs. Adverse effects were identified for an archaeological site (unmapped, not on the Wyse Fork Battlefield); the Wyse Fork Battlefield; and the Cobb-King Humphrey House. On June 15, 2022, the USACE invited national, state, and local historical agencies and organizations and key property owners to participate in a meeting with consulting parties pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act to look at ways to minimize the project’s adverse effects on historic resources. Based on input from the consulting parties, additional efforts and evaluations were undertaken to further reduce adverse effects to historic resources. Subsequently, on Nov 9, 2023, the USACE hosted a second consulting parties meeting to present the additional efforts and receive further input from the consulting parties.
What is NCDOT doing to minimize adverse effects to the Wyse Fork Battlefield and other historic resources?
In 2017, the Wyse Fork Battlefield was listed in the National Register of Historic Places, which established the battlefield boundaries following National Park Service guidance. In 2022, the bypass project was determined to have an adverse effect to the battlefield. Specific adverse effects identified include the proposed new eastside connector interchange and ramps between existing U.S. 70 and the new bypass; a proposed interchange and ramps at Caswell Station and Wyse Fork roads in Jones County; and proposed service roads. NCDOT evaluated multiple design alternatives for the current junction between U.S. 70 and Wyse Fork/Caswell Station roads; the design alternatives vary in impacts to the battlefield.

In 2017, the Cobb-King Humphrey House property was determined eligible for listing on the NRHP. In 2022, the bypass project was determined to have an adverse effect to the property. Specific effects include a narrow strip of land in front of the house and change in access. The Cobb-King Humphrey house and outbuildings will not be directly impacted by the project and will remain in their original locations.

In 1998, the Henry Loftin Herring Farm was determined eligible for listing on the NRHP. In 2022, the bypass project was determined to have no adverse effects on the farm, even though the property is being impacted. Specific impacts are from the new west side connector interchange between existing U.S. 70 and the new bypass. These impacts were evaluated for minimization and mitigation solutions.

In 1990, Kelly’s Millpond was determined eligible for the NRHP. In 2022, the bypass project was determined to have no adverse effects on the Kelly’s Millpond site as the bypass project will not be impacting it. In 1998, the Dr. James Parrot House was determined eligible for listing on the NRHP. In 2022, the bypass project was determined to have no adverse effects on the Dr. James Parrot House as the bypass project will not be impacting it.

As required by the National Historic Preservation Act, USACE is working closely with NCDOT and NCHPO, as well as using the findings of the archaeological surveys and input from Section 106 consulting parties, to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the adverse effect to various historic resources. These efforts are documented in a draft Memorandum of Agreement that will be appended to the Final Environmental Impact Statement.
What are the project’s next steps?
- Final Environmental Impact Statement (2026)
- Open House & Public Comment (2026)
- Design Public Hearing (2026)
- Record of Decision (2027)
How was the Wyse Fork/Caswell Station Road interchange design developed?
In 2022, NCDOT proposed a design option to build a full-access interchange at the existing at-grade intersection of Caswell Station/Wyse Fork roads in Jones County. After receiving public feedback via two Section 106 Consulting Parties meetings (required under the National Historic Preservation Act), NCDOT reviewed other preliminary design options for upgrading the conventional intersection to interstate standards. Each option impacted the Wyse Fork Battlefield to a different extent and necessitated the construction of service roads for existing residences and businesses in Wyse Fork. The options included the construction of a compressed-diamond interchange to minimize those impacts.
In May 2024, NCDOT developed a compressed diamond design option that would build an interchange 0.3 miles to the east of the existing intersection. The existing intersection would be closed at U.S. 70. This option would require 32.2 acres of new right of way. NCDOT made this revision to provide a reasonable balance between competing interests, the needs of the project, and the requests made by stakeholders who make up the Section 106 Consulting Parties.
NCDOT also evaluated two other options before determining they would not meet the need and purpose of this project. The first option would have built an overpass without direct highway access to the two side roads. After a thorough review, it was determined that the no-access option did not provide the level of connectivity needed. To learn why this access is so critical, watch this short video.
The second option would have involved relocating the interchange between 1.1 and 1.5 miles to the east out of the battlefield’s historic boundary. After a thorough review, it was determined that relocating the interchange that far east would not be reasonable for several reasons. These reasons included that there is no existing road network south of U.S. 70 to provide connectivity to the Jones County community; it would significantly raise costs; increase project timelines; reduce highway access; and increase environmental and property impacts.
How can I learn more about the project and provide input?
The project website provides information including maps, schedule updates, estimated costs, and associated studies. The project website will be updated as more information becomes available. You can provide comments, request to be added to the project mailing list, or request to be notified of upcoming public involvement opportunities by calling the toll-free project hotline at call (800) 233-6315 (bilingual option available) or using the Contact form.

12/3/2025 7:40 AM